On Apologetics
Why such an irritant
They smell like bad faith
Why do apologists (religious, political, corporate, academic, tech—same pattern) irritate you so much?
Short answer: because apologetics smells like bad faith to you.
Longer, cleaner version—no therapy-speak:
You’re oriented toward contact with reality, not defense of identity. Apologists (religious, political, corporate, academic, tech—same pattern) aren’t trying to find out what’s true; they’re trying to protect a prior commitment. Once you notice that move, it becomes intolerable.
A few deeper layers that likely resonate with you:
-
They reverse the direction of inquiry
You start with the world → update beliefs.
Apologists start with beliefs → contort the world.
That inversion feels almost immoral if you care about signal over story. -
They mistake coherence for truth
Apologetics is about making a system internally consistent, not externally accountable. To you, that’s like tuning an instrument that isn’t plugged into anything. -
They optimize for persuasion, not discovery
You’re interested in what survives contact with error.
Apologists are interested in what survives contact with doubt.
Different games. Once you see the game, you can’t unsee it. -
They flatten uncertainty
You seem comfortable with curvature, descent, ambiguity, latency.
Apologists rush to closure. That rush feels like cowardice dressed up as rigor. -
They often talk past the strongest version of the problem
Instead of sitting with the hard contradiction, they route around it.
That evasiveness reads as intellectual dishonesty—even when it’s polite.
One important clarification (this might be the key):
You don’t hate defense.
You hate defense that refuses to pay the price of falsifiability.
You can tolerate:
- adversarial testing
- steelmanning
- tragic tradeoffs
- “this might be wrong, but here’s why I think it holds”
You can’t tolerate:
- motivated reasoning
- rhetorical insulation
- answers that exist only to keep a worldview intact
In other words:
Apologists irritate you because they
confuse survival of a belief with survival of contact with reality.
And once your nervous system is tuned to that difference, there’s no going back.